From 1 - 10 / 22
  • The GSQ Eulo 3 borehole was drilled approximately 50 km SW of Eulo, Queensland. The borehole was designed to test aeromagnetic anomalies in the basement rocks and to test the electrical conductivity properties of cover and basement rocks.

  • The Janina 1 borehole was drilled approximately 110 km W of Bourke, New South Wales. The borehole was designed to test aeromagnetic anomalies in the basement rocks and to test the electrical conductivity properties of cover and basement rocks to validate airborne electromagnetic (AEM) data.

  • The Milcarpa 1 borehole was drilled approximately 9 km SSE of Hungerford, Queensland, adjacent to the road between Hungerford and Wanaaring, NSW. The borehole was designed to test aeromagnetic anomalies in the basement rocks, test the electrical conductivity properties of cover and basement rocks to validate airborne electromagnetic (AEM) data, and to test pre-drilling geophysical cover thickness estimates.

  • The GSQ Eulo 4 borehole was drilled approximately 35.5 km SW of Eulo, Queensland. The borehole was designed to test aeromagnetic anomalies in the basement rocks, and to test the electrical conductivity properties of cover and basement rocks to validate airborne electromagnetic (AEM) data.

  • The Tongo 1 borehole was drilled approximately 83 km NE of White Cliffs, New South Wales. The borehole was designed to test aeromagnetic anomalies in the basement rocks and to test the electrical conductivity properties of cover and basement rocks to validate airborne electromagnetic (AEM) data.

  • The Congararra 1 borehole was drilled approximately 70 km NNW of Bourke, NSW. The borehole was designed to test aeromagnetic anomalies in the basement rocks, test the electrical conductivity properties of cover and basement rocks to validate airborne electromagnetic (AEM) data, and to test pre-drilling geophysical cover thickness estimates.

  • The Euroli 1 borehole was drilled approximately 23 km SSW of Hungerford, Queensland (which is located on the New South Wales-Queensland border). The borehole was designed to test aeromagnetic anomalies in the basement rocks, test the electrical conductivity properties of cover and basement rocks to validate airborne electromagnetic (AEM) data, and to test pre-drilling geophysical cover thickness estimates. The Euroli 1 borehole was commenced as a vertical mud rotary borehole and was completed with a deviated diamond drilled tail using a wedge.

  • The Laurelvale 1 borehole was drilled approximately 78 km SSW of Wanaaring, New South Wales, adjacent to the through-road between Tongo and Tilpa. The borehole was designed to test the geology of indistinct, linear aeromagnetic anomalies in the basement rocks, test the electrical conductivity properties of cover and basement rocks to validate airborne electromagnetic (AEM) data, and to test pre-drilling geophysical cover thickness estimates.

  • The GSQ Cunnamulla 1 borehole was drilled approximately 110 km SE of Cunnamulla, Queensland. The borehole was designed to test aeromagnetic anomalies in the basement rocks, test the electrical conductivity properties of cover and basement rocks, and to test pre-drilling geophysical cover thickness estimates.

  • The National Geochemical Survey of Australia (NGSA) provides an internally consistent, state-of-the-art, continental-scale geochemical dataset that can be used to assess areas of Australia more elevated in commodity metals and/or pathfinder elements than others. But do regions elevated in such elements correspond to known mineralized provinces, and what is the best method for detecting and thus potentially predicting those? Here, using base metal associations as an example, I compare a trivariate rank-based index and a multivariate-based Principal Component Analysis method. The analysis suggests that the simpler rank-based index better discriminates catchments endowed with known base metal mineralization from barren ones and could be used as a first-pass prospectivity tool. <b>Citation:</b> Patrice de Caritat, Continental-scale geochemical surveys and mineral prospectivity: Comparison of a trivariate and a multivariate approach, <i>Journal of Geochemical Exploration</i>, Volume 188, 2018, Pages 87-94, ISSN 0375-6742, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gexplo.2018.01.014